With the goings on over the last week I’ve now become convinced that the S in SNP stands for “schizophrenic” as they are trying to present so many different opinions as being representative of the party. It started with Alyn Smith MP launching an attack on certain interest groups within the SNP whose aims do not wholly align with his (Common Weal, Women’s rights) while being fully supportive of individuals and alliances whose aims are more in line with his “self indulgent views” as he puts it, transgender being a notable one.
This was followed by Humza Yousaf demanding that the SNP “must leave space” for BAME candidates. Does Alyn Smith approve of Mr Yousaf trying to change party policy to fit his “self indulgent views or is this a aim which he supports and which therefore escapes his wrath.
Elected politicians are elected to represent the people, yet often they seek office purely to advance their own personal agendas, and are using the framework of whatever party they join to do so, something which irritates me immensely when they say that they are voting with “their” conscience.
In the past I have written about my objection to women only shortlists, and my reasoning then is the same now; I want to see the best people elected, irrespective of sex, sexual orientation, colour or ethnic background. These principles apply to any other group from society, if you are good enough then stand an be elected on your merits, not because others were excluded .
Then there is “Comfy”Pete Wishart who also joined in alongside Smith with his attack on our pro-independence bloggers. At the present time I would take the opinions of the bloggers over those of those with financial skin in the game, especially one who stated that he wanted to be speaker of a parliament he had been sent to extricate us from. What personal gain is there to the Grouse Beater or the Barrhead Boy to criticise the SNP’s glacial approach to independence? What do they have to achieve by pointing out the repeated use of the“carrot and stick” by the party, other than to prick the conscience of those who deploy such tactics, or to alert the Yes movement to the fact and make sure that they become immune to it, and that they instead hold them to their promises.
The independence movement recognises that as the largest independence party is the SNP, and as such we need them to be successful, whether we support them wholly or not. We must be able to see when attacks on the SNP are warranted and when they are simply aimed at destabilising the independence movement as a whole. Unfortunately many criticisms of the SNP are not only warranted but self-inflicted, and if the bloggers or party members point this out, it is with the intention of having them sort things out, and Messrs Smith and Wishart would be minded to remember this, rather than go on the attack against people who want nothing more than independence. The bullying of party members at every level, such as Joanna Cherry down to the grass roots, for holding views which are unpopular amongst faceless cliques must stop. Scotland is on a race against time against an increasingly English Nationalist parliament’s wishes to close it down, and they need to regain focus on their real goal – independence. Whenever voices are raised within the grass roots about the kind of Scotland they want, be socialist, be it a republic, be it in or out of NATO, they are told to “wheesht” for indy, that there will be plenty of time for that after independence. Perhaps those on charge of the SNP should bear that in mind too, keep your self-interest to your self and create a Scotland right now which we can all rally to protect, one which even the dwindling unionists might think twice about losing.