Hope Over Smear?

Sunday Herald, 20th September 2015

Sunday Herald, 20th September 2015

Submitted to The Sunday Herald, 230915

Dear Sir,

To say I was disappointed in The Sunday Herald’s coverage of pro-independence rally Hope over Fear last week is something of an understatement. On the face of it, it would appear that the Sunday Herald has taken a strop at being denied access to the free tea and biscuits and have thrown a hissy fit. I had a peek at the backstage area and it was pretty small, not a great deal of room at all. The press were all invited onstage around lunchtime so they could get a crowd shot, then they had the run of the square to speak to people there. Sadly the Sunday Herald took to social media with claims of being banned from the event, yet other national and international media were wandering around unfettered. My recollection of your previous Hope over Fear coverage has been that it has been fairly negative: playing down the crowd numbers, suggestions of backstage shenanigans, an obligatory mention of Tommy’s colourful past, with a side helping of vitriol courtesy of Rosie Kane. It’s no surprise then that there was no red carpet laid out, but a ban? Nonsense! What could and indeed should have been positive coverage of thousands of independence supporters from all ages and backgrounds gathering to show that they are as committed to Yes now as they were a year ago instead became a negative hatchet job aimed at Mr Sheridan. The coverage contained no photos, as photos would have put paid to the assertations that there were only 1500 attending and that the Herald was denied access to the event. Anyone who was there knows that at its busiest there were around four to five thousand in the Square, yet the Herald choose to run with the BBC figure of 1500. You have to be desperate to quote the BBC as source material, as they probably get their figures from Labour’s Chief Statistician Kezia Dugdale, whose maths skills leave a lot to be desired.

In a wider context it is also disappointing that Yes Scotland has not continued in some form or other, as there are clearly thousands of people out there looking for collective outlets to express their desire for independence. Having built networks and friendships there is a desire to keep the momentum of street activism going, and this is not being met by the SNP, indeed it cannot be left to the SNP. Yes drew support from across a wide spectrum and requires a focus point, which at present Hope Over Fear is providing. Few of the people I have spoken to at these events intend to vote for Tommy Sheridan but they are grateful for his efforts in providing a chance to gather and to celebrate the positive energy of the Yes campaign.

Perhaps this latest vindictive attack says more about the SNP’s fears about losing second votes to Solidarity in 2016, but this dig was badly judged and will no doubt leave a sour taste in the mouth of many of us who have returned to buying print journalism after boycotting an openly biased unionist press. The Sunday Herald is living well at the moment on succulent lamb, and pet journalists who dance specifically to an SNP tune are as worrying to me as having a unionist biased media lined up against us, as without a fair and critical eye the SNP will be drawn into the bad practices that Labour were, and in the long run that can only damage the fight for independence.

Yours,

James Cassidy

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Hope Over Smear?

  1. Maureen Luby Vss

    “Perhaps this latest vindictive attack says more about the SNP’s fears about losing second votes to Solidarity in 2016…”. Are you really accusing the SNP for the stance of the Sunday Herald? And do you have proof that journalists are dancing to the SNP tune? I was in agreement with everything you said until the bizarre SNP bad rant in your last paragraph. Disappointed.

    Like

    Reply
    1. jester1970 Post author

      Jeez, not the “Do you have proof” line! That’s how politics works! Do you agree that all political parties should be scrutinised equally? Would you be happy to shout about Labour and Tory MPs lining their pockets using expenses, but make excuses if an SNP politician does likewise? If so you are part of the problem with politics in general. I’m going to put this as plainly as I can: ANY politician who abuses the system deserves to be exposed. They cheapen politics, creating distrust in the system. I’ll be as plain as I can with this as well: I’m YES. Not SNP. Not Solidarity. Not Green. YES. I don’t care for the little Napoleon’s, the empire builders, those who are looking at their own little patch to see what they can get out of it. So I’ll say what needs to be said, I’ll not remain silent, especially when the actions of the empire builders can damage Yes as a whole. We don’t need them.

      Like

      Reply
      1. Maureen Luby Vss

        Oh my! You certainly are reading between the lines and coming to your own bizarre conclusions, aren’t you?
        “Do you agree that all political parties should be scrutinised equally? Would you be happy to shout about Labour and Tory MPs lining their pockets using expenses, but make excuses if an SNP politician does likewise? If so you are part of the problem with politics in general”. This part of your little rant makes no sense whatsoever in reply to my comment. I’m not even sure that you know what the original article in the Sunday Herald is about. It’s nothing to do with the SNP or any political party. Saor Alba 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      2. jester1970 Post author

        Maureen, what I find bizarre is that you can accept that David Cameron f**ked a pig, but can’t accept that politicians will use the media to run stories damaging their opponents.

        Like

  2. mearnsgeek

    “We don’t need them.”

    No, we *do* need the SNP. The entire Independence movement has to deal with political establishments such as Holyrood and Westminster. Consider the SNP as the gateway to them. We’d not get very far without the SNP being in a position of strength.

    You’re totally right about them needing to be scrutinised along with every party though. No disagreements there.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s